weather modification

weather modification

3/2/2015 -- Meteorologists WANT TO 'GATEKEEP' science data - 2015 Weather Modification Conference

1d ago
SOURCE  

Description

This should be troubling for even the most hardcore skeptic of weather modification to hear. Professionals talking about the need for them to GATEKEEP information, science data, and discourse by the public on topics pertaining to weather, and weather modification. Gatekeeping literally means CONTROLLING the information. Controlling access, controlling content, and they even talk of managing the message being sent out across all areas. Can't have any conflicting messages in science????? This is crazy, this is fascism. Fascism and science do NOT mix well ethically. As seen with the fascist Italians, and fascist Nazi's, or fascist communists of Russia + China. Yes, there can be advances made when everyone is marching in lock step, in the same direction using the same data, and being FORCED to come to the same conclusions. Fascism in science is how we got RACIST science, eugenics (killing of those with disabilities) , and a whole generation of people who falsely used "science" and this "group think" mentality to push false GATEKEPT data .... like the data from the Nazi's on Aryan supremacy (which was flawed and skewed based upon this groupthink and gatekeeping of information). http://wwwzenger.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/~huckle/fasc.pdf It is shocking to hear these professionals say it publicly, like gatekeeping is some kind of ideal to work towards. They also talk of "control" and problems they have with people on social media doing their OWN forecasting. They obviously don't like outsiders , and people who they CANNOT control being involved. They specifically mention this "control" they are losing several times. Word to these unscientific parrot repeaters who are more concerned with control, and uniformity than in truth, and real science which rocks the boat. To these people who think their certificate (piece of paper) from XYZ institution somehow puts them on another level , putting them above their fellow citizens--- ironic you now want to control other peoples access to data based upon your own educational experiences. This is a case of one citizen , who is involved in meteorology for a paid job, thinking other citizens who are not getting paid don't have a right to know basic science data without being TOLD WHAT TO THINK about said data. Clearly social media is getting under their thin skin. By the way, this response about social media (from them) is due to major talk in the public, using social media to talk about weather modification (geoengineering) , cloud seeding (slang term chemtrails), HAARP, NEXRAD RADAR pulses, scalar squares, and other forms of WXMOD (weather modification). The "gatekeepers" do NOT want other sciences getting involved, and certainly do not want outsiders to have a voice equal to theirs! This is outrageous in any field, but in science it is not only an outrage, this is a logical fallacy. An appeal to authority is indeed a fallacy of logic when the data speaks for itself. http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/index.php/logical-fallacies/21-appeal-to-authority https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority "Definition: Using an authority as evidence in your argument when the authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument. As the audience, allowing an irrelevant authority to add credibility to the claim being made. Logical Form: According to person 1, Y is true. Therefore, Y is true." Summed up , we do NOT need a central authority dictating weather news, and data. Do you job to PROVIDE all the data to everyone, and let the data lead people where it leads them. Some will never look into the data at all, and accept what they are told by others. Other people , like me for instance ;) , would prefer to not have a talking head on TEEVEE tell us what to think about said data. If you cut the data, alter the data, or hold data for yourselves, then you should not get any public financing. Plain and simple. ____ This bold a...