the supreme court

Description

oetoro-Obama Illegally Directs NON-Ratified 3rd Central Bank ("federal" reserve) Illegal Collection Agency (IRS) to Target Republicans and Conservative Groups: http://files.myopera.com/cliffordanthonypaiva/blog/Soetoro%20Obama%20Illegally%20Uses%20FED-IRS%20Collection%20Agency.pdf White House Controlled Propaganda Through National Media Authoritarian and Fraud-Based (11 Sep 2001) Patriot Act/Homeland Security BILL OF RIGHTS: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html 16th Amendment NEVER LEGALLY Ratified: The Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States was never ratified by the required number of States. This is the Amendment that allegedly entitled the Federal Agent (government) in the federal territory of Washington, D.C. and their private collection company, the IRS, to collect "income tax" as falsely declared to be ratified in February 1913. After an exhaustive year long search of legislative records in forty-eight sovereign states (Alaska and Hawaii weren't admitted into the Union until after 1913). The only record of the 16th Amendment having been confirmed was a proclamation made by Secretary of State Philander Knox on February 25, 1913, wherein he simply declared it to be "in effect," but never stated it was lawfully ratified. Even if the 16th Amendment were properly ratified, according to Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, it has always been unconstitutional for the U.S. Federal Government to directly tax We the People in our property, wages, salaries and earnings. The judges of the U.S. Supreme Court rejected any claims that the 16th Amendment changed the constitutional limits on direct taxes in Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), when they ruled that it "created no new power of taxation" and that it "did not change the constitutional limitations which forbid any direct taxation of individuals." After investigating the history of the 16th Amendment, the following defects were found in the ratification of the Income Tax Amendment by the forty-eight states then existing, three-fourths of which (thirty-six) were needed to ratify it: Not ratified by state legislature and so reported Not ratified by state legislature, but reported as ratified Missing or incomplete evidence of ratification, but reported as ratified Failure of Governor or other official to sign, although required by State Constitution Other violation of State Constitution in ratification process Other procedural irregularity making ratification doubtful Approval, but with change in wording, accepted as ratification of original version Approval, but with change in spelling, accepted as ratification of original version Approval, but with change in capitalization, accepted as ratification of original version Approval, but with change in punctuation, accepted as ratification of original version US Central Bank and IRS Illegal Connection: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cd1ImYz7YPs Post Civil War, Reconstruction, and popular tax reform (1866--1900) After the Civil War, Reconstruction, railroads, and transforming the North and South war machines towards peacetime required public funding. However, in 1872, seven years after the war, lawmakers allowed the temporary Civil War income tax to expire. Income taxes evolved, but in 1894 the Supreme Court declared the Income Tax of 1894 unconstitutional in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.. The federal government scrambled to raise money.[3] In 1906, with the election of President Theodore Roosevelt, and later his successor William Howard Taft, the United States saw a populist movement for tax reform. This movement culminated during then candidate Woodrow Wilson's election of 1912 and in February, 1913, the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution:" The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, an...