Message sent! Check your Phone

FALSE FLAG Condi Says Afghan War Pre-Planned, Military Operations Ok'd A Week Before 9/11 Attacks

1y ago
SOURCE  

Description

How To Go To Heaven: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/how_to_be_saved.html The war in Afghanistan started one week before the twin tower attacks. Condoleezza Rice tells the 9/11 commission Bush ordered invasion of Afghanistan on September 4th 2001. A WEEK BEFORE 9/11. Taken from Rice's testimony at the ninth public hearing of the 9/11 commission on April 8th 2004. You can see a transcript and video of her entire testimony here: http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/archive/hearing9/index.htm Reuploaded from 91177info2 channel- http://www.youtube.com/user/91177info2 http://www.rense.com/general15/preplanned.htm Pre-Planned US/UK War Against Afghanistan By Francis A. Boyle fboyle@law.uiuc.edu 10-12-1 Obviously, the war against Afghanistan was planned for quite some time We know for a fact that it had been war-gamed by the Pentagon going back to 1997 Right around September 11, two US Aircraft carrier task forces conveniently arrived in the Persian Gulf right at the same time on "rotation" Obviously, preplanned Just before September 11, the UK had put together what was billed at the "largest armada since the Falklands War" and had it steaming towards Oman, where now 23,000 UK troops are on maneuvers This had been planned for at least 3 years Also, the US "Bright Star" operation is currently going on in Egypt 23,000 US troops plus an additional 17,000 from NATO and its associates This had been planned at least two years ago Finally, NATO just landed 12,000 troops into Turkey This had been planned for at least two years It is obvious that we are seeing an operational War Plan being executed here that had been in the works for at least the past four years September 11 is either a pretext or a trigger or both. Francis A Boyle Professor of International Law Francis A Boyle Law Building 504 E Pennsylvania Ave Champaign, IL 61820 USA 217-333-7954 217-244-1478 fax http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/sep/06/september11.iraq This war on terrorism is bogus The 9/11 attacks gave the US an ideal pretext to use force to secure its global domination Michael Meacher 6 September 2003 Massive attention has now been given - and rightly so - to the reasons why Britain went to war against Iraq. But far too little attention has focused on why the US went to war, and that throws light on British motives too. The conventional explanation is that after the Twin Towers were hit, retaliation against al-Qaida bases in Afghanistan was a natural first step in launching a global war against terrorism. Then, because Saddam Hussein was alleged by the US and UK governments to retain weapons of mass destruction, the war could be extended to Iraq as well. However this theory does not fit all the facts. The truth may be a great deal murkier. We now know that a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), Jeb Bush (George Bush's younger brother) and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences, was written in September 2000 by the neoconservative think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC). The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says "while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." The PNAC blueprint supports an earlier document attributed to Wolfowitz and Libby which said the US must "discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role". It refers to key allies such as the UK as "the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership". It describes peacekeeping missions as "demanding American political leadership rather than that o...