BigThink
ADD TO SMART CHANNEL
NEW SMART CHANNEL
-
Daniel Altman: Everything You Need to Know About Gold
BigThink 10mo ago
-
SERAPH
BigThink 3d ago
-
Henry Alex Rubin: Is Technology Disconnecting Us?
BigThink 4d ago
-
The basics of boson - Dave Barney and Steve Goldfarb
BigThink 4d ago
-
Designing Confidence
BigThink 4d ago
-
Mary Roach: A Day in the Life of Your Gut
BigThink 5d ago
-
Star Trek's Warp Drive: Are We There Yet? | Video
BigThink 6d ago
-
Robo Raven (UMD Robotics)
BigThink 1w ago
-
Space Oddity
BigThink 1w ago
-
YouTube Curated By Dawn Kasper - MOCAtv
BigThink 1w ago
-
Neil deGrasse Tyson: Want Scientifically Literate Children? Get Out of Their Way.
BigThink 1w ago
-
High School Student gives a lesson to its teacher at Duncanville
BigThink 1w ago
-
Eric Siegel: You Are So Predictable
BigThink 1w ago
-
Nanex ~ Order Routing Animation ~ 02-May-2013 ~ JNJ
BigThink 1w ago
-
Big Think Mentor: From Big Think to Big Action
BigThink 1w ago
-
Curated By - Brooke Candy (v1)
BigThink 1w ago
Tags
Description
Economist Daniel Altman on gold's economic stability and why we shouldn't return to the gold standard. Transcript-- Daniel Altman: Everybody's talking about gold these days. And I wish I had some to show you, but I don't own any, so sorry. The thing about gold is it is a very important part of our financial system when we're looking at the expectation of inflation because even though inflation can mean that the value of currencies goes down, gold is supposed to hold its value. And that's because people will always accept gold in trade for other things, so we hope. Gold has intrinsic value, gold is nice to look at and it's useful in a lot of commercial products. But it's also accepted and has been symbolically for hundreds of years as a medium of exchange, as a unit of account, and as a store of value. There could have been another focal point. Perhaps it could have been quartz. Quartz would have been seen as a great store of value. But traditionally quartz doesn't have that role even though, like gold, there's probably a limited supply of quartz crystals in the world. Gold is where it's at. And everybody sort of accepts gold; that's what makes it valuable. The problem is, if we were to base our monetary system on gold, as some people like Ron Paul had proposed, we would have a fixed amount of gold equal to one dollar and every time we wanted to issue more currency, we would have to make sure that we had that much more gold in our treasury. What happens then though? Think about what would happen if somebody discovered a huge amount of new gold that we didn't know about in the world. All the sudden, the supply of gold would be much higher and that would probably mean that the price of gold would go down in world markets. But that would have a profound effect on our own currency too because each of our dollars would now be worth less, through no fault of our own. So we would have a devalued currency simply as a result of this discovery of gold. That's not something that we want to mess around with because it means that other people and other events can control our monetary policy, which is one of our most basic tools for affecting our economy and our economic cycle. So if you want to use gold as part of our monetary system, you have to think very hard about the fluctuations that we'd be exposing ourselves to.
